Studi Evaluasi Indikator Kemiskinan Kabupaten Bantul
|Project At Glance
Country | Indonesia |
---|---|
Region | Bantul |
Name of Client | BAPPEDA Bantul |
Address | - |
Duration of Assignment | 3 bulan |
Start Date | Juni 2010 |
Completion Date | Agustus 2010 |
Prinsipal Investigator | Dr. Pande Made Kutanegara, M.Si. |
Principal Investigator (Not on the list) | |
Research Team | Sumini, S.Si., M.Sc., Sonyaruri Satiti, S.Si., M.Sc. |
Research Team (not on the list) | |
Profiles of Professional Staff Provided by The Center | Pakar Antropologi, Demografi |
Latest Research
Census and Social Economy Survey in DAVs and non-DAVs Tangguh LNG Project
British Petroleum Indonesia has conducted a range of policies, programs…
22 August 2014 - 09:32:50Stakeholders Mapping Study in Musi Banyuasin, South Sumatra
ConocoPhillips Indonesia believes that the company's production activities can’t be…
31 January 2014 - 11:08:50Dynamics of Social Change and Potential Conflict Study in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta
The composition of people in Yogyakarta is diverse in culture.…
31 December 2013 - 11:33:13Child Education Quality Survey 2013 (Baseline and Midline Study)
One of the several poverty reduction programmes launched by the…
30 December 2013 - 12:53:49Young, Eligible, Low Parity Couples (PUSMUPAR) Study in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta
Efforts to accelerate the decline in fertility through family planning…
20 December 2013 - 15:10:04The Compilation of Poverty Assessment Method Basen on Area/Village in Yogyakarta City
The title as ‘education city’ as well as a tourist…
20 December 2013 - 15:04:03Corporate Social Responsibility Program Assessment Study for Micro Small and Medium Scale Enterprises (UMKM)
CPPS studied the corporate social responsibilities (CSR) programs which being…
12 December 2013 - 10:05:54The evaluation study measures the output and outcomes of poverty indicator against the inputs and plan and standards.. The evaluation was done by giving control over the research area, so that can know the pattern of changes that occur with increasing or decreasing certain indicators. The evaluation study was conducted in 17 sub-districts in Bantul district which represents the coast, plains, and mountains areas, as well as the urban and rural areas. Data were collected by qualitative and quantitative methods including observation, in-depth interviews and FGD (Focus Group Discussion). The evaluation focused on three main aspects: (1) human resources, (2) indicators sensitiveness to measure poverty, and (3) the mechanism and purpose of the indicators. The result shows that (1) seven of the eleven poverty indicators are less sensitive for measuring poverty, such as residential buildings, sources of electric lighting, water usage, number of family members, eating less than 2 times a day, wealth, ability to get medication from primary health care, (2) There is variation in indicators of understanding between the officer, (3) data collection is not carried out through a rigor methodological stages, (4) data collection is still dependent, and (5) poverty indicators under evaluation are still emphasizing the fulfillment of basic needs rather than on empowerment aspect.